In July 1968, St Ives was a modest market town on the River Ouse, still adjusting to the rapid changes of the post-war decades. The town’s population was growing, new housing estates were expanding to the north, and traffic through the centre had become a pressing problem.
Alongside these pressures, there was an increasing awareness of heritage and conservation, spurred in part by national debates about the loss of historic buildings and landscapes. It was in this atmosphere that local residents began to discuss forming a Civic Society, a body that could give voice to concerns about the town’s future.
The spark for action was a proposal by Huntingdonshire County Council to drive a relief road across Hemingford Meadow to the west of the town. The road, if built, would cut across one of the most treasured approaches to St Ives, threatening views from the medieval bridge towards the parish church and damaging the riverside setting that gave the town its distinctive character.
![]() |
County Surveyor's western route, across Holt Island and Hemingford Meadow. |
This possibility brought together a group of residents who believed that St Ives needed an organised society to protect its interests and, more broadly, to engage the community in thinking about its future. The Civic Society of St Ives was the result.
![]() |
St Ives bridge before the relief road was built. |
![]() |
The Highways Department image of proposed by-pass from end of Ramsey Road. |
Further discussions followed in August, when additional figures became involved. Humphrey Warren, now a County Councillor and President of St Ives Rowing Club, became the Society’s first Chairman. Bill Harrison, brother of Molly Harrison, became Secretary. A civil engineer, he specialised in highways.
![]() |
Five of the Founding 10. |
The founding group moved quickly. They secured the Free Church room for a public meeting, arranged speakers, and prepared publicity. The Mayor was invited to preside, and notices were printed to advertise the event. Letters were sent to local organisations—the Chamber of Trade, Ratepayers’ Association, Rotarians, Women’s Institute, and churches—urging their members to attend. Handbills were distributed in shops and displayed at the History Exhibition in the Corn Exchange. By late September, the stage was set.
Humphrey Warren explained the purpose of the proposed Society. It would be concerned with the preservation, restoration, alteration, and development of St Ives, and would provide a forum where elected bodies, professionals, and the public could discuss issues openly. Decisions would rest with members, not outside authorities, and the Society would not act as a “rubber stamp”. This emphasis on independence and openness proved persuasive. When the resolution to form the Society was put, it was carried unanimously.
After the formal vote, officers were elected. Humphrey Warren became Chairman, Bill Harrison Secretary, and Miss Scott Treasurer. A committee of seven was appointed. Those seven were Mary Grove, Hugh O’Neill, Jean Mellanby, George Clay, Colonel Munro, J. P. Wilkinson, and K. C. Digby.
Architect Michael Green, himself a native of St Ives, then gave a talk entitled The Threat to St Ives. He argued that the western route would destroy the landscape setting that made the town unique. Illustrated with photographs, he compared older buildings that had been lost with their modern replacements and warned that the same fate awaited the meadow and riverside if the plan went ahead. His intervention helped to frame the bypass not only as a transport issue but also as a matter of heritage and identity.
The early officers and committee members brought a mix of skills. Humphrey Warren was an experienced local politician and businessman. Bill Harrison's speciality was road civil engineering. Committee members such as Mary Grove and Jean Mellanby were active in planning and publicity. Hugh O’Neill offered the professional insight of an architect. The presence of Colonel Munro and others gave the Society additional standing in the community. Within weeks of its founding, the Society had already gathered more than a hundred paid-up members, an impressive start for a voluntary organisation.
In October 1968, the Society invited the Assistant Editor of the Architectural Review, Mr Timothy Rock, to speak. He presented slides and commentary on St Ives’ built environment. The meeting drew around 100 people and reinforced the view that the bridge, the Waits, and the riverside were of great importance. Arguments against the western route multiplied; it would cut the town in two, bring heavy traffic near schools and the library, and undermine residential streets. An alternative eastern route could follow the line of the disused railway and serve industrial areas better.
Later that year the County Planning Officer, L G Robinson, attended a meeting of the Society to defend the western route with maps and diagrams. He insisted it was superior on grounds of aesthetics, disturbance, traffic and cost, yet admitted it had not been approved. Questioned for over an hour, Society members challenged the assumptions behind the plan, asked for traffic census details, and pressed for alternatives. Even Councillor Collinson, Chairman of the County Planning Committee, admitted to being impressed by the quality of the debate and promised that the eastern option would be considered. For the Society, this was an early sign that their efforts were having an effect.
![]() |
Questionnaire distributed to members, December 1968. |
By 1969, the Society had formed further study groups, which distributed reports to members and, in some cases, to local councils and national bodies. One study concluded that the town’s river frontage required careful management to preserve views and accommodate industry without damaging the setting. Another explored options for tree planting, recommending species and sites that would enhance the town’s appearance. These initiatives showed that the Society was willing to look beyond immediate issues to the longer-term shaping of St Ives.
By early 1969, there were over 110 members. Meetings attracted audiences ranging from 50 to 120 people. The Society established itself as a recognised forum for civic discussion, drawing in speakers from across the region and beyond.
The County Council was asked to study and cost both routes in detail. This marked a shift; until then, only the western route had been seriously developed. The Society had succeeded in opening up the debate and ensuring that alternatives were given due consideration. Although the Borough Council initially voted against the eastern option, the fact that the matter was under review was itself a victory of sorts.
Behind the scenes, the Society also secured offers of legal assistance. A barrister specialising in planning cases and a solicitor both agreed to provide services at nominal fees should a Public Inquiry be called. This gave the Society confidence that it could pursue its case at the highest levels if necessary.
![]() |
The three routes considered by the Public Inquiry. |
By 1972, that stage had arrived. A Public Inquiry was held in St Ives Corn Exchange in October to consider one western route and two eastern alternatives. The Society presented its case formally. Although the western route was no longer certain, nor was an eastern option assured. The County Council and other interested parties also put forward their arguments. The following documents were submitted to the Inquiry (click to view).
Civic Society's Proof of Evidence
County Council Statement
County Planning Officer's Report
County Surveyor's Evidence Report
St Ives Rowing Club Submission
Needingworth Road Objectors
The Society’s first five years had brought recognition, a growing membership, and success in forcing the bypass debate into the open. Yet the outcome still depended on decisions beyond their control. The story of the Civic Society’s first five years closed, with the town anxiously awaiting the outcome of the Public Inquiry.
To view the Society's minutes for this period, click Civic Society of St Ives minutes 1968-1972.
No comments:
Post a Comment